Sat.5Oct2019
Note to Current Attorney General,DFL, YOU WANTED THE JOB, SEPARTION POWERS.
Tracking impressed with Medicad https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/27_MedicaidFraud.asp
https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/24_ChappysGoldenShores.asp
http://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/TheresaOlson_Complaint.pdf
and tobacco https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/26_TobaccoSettlement.asp
September 26, 2019 (SAINT PAUL) — On Tuesday, September 24, Ramsey County District Court ruled that R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company has wrongfully failed to pay the State millions of dollars it owes under the terms the State’s historic 1998 tobacco settlement. In the coming months, the court will enter judgment for the amount R.J. Reynolds owes the State for its wrongful underpayment. The Minnesota Attorney General’s Office brought this case to enforce the terms of the settlement.
Claims Election,tax,interest Fraud,TheftbySwindle of Resolutions/Ordinance,
Is garbage enough to get upstart candidates elected to the St. Paul City Council? | MinnPost
https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/24_ChappysGoldenShores.asp
http://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/TheresaOlson_Complaint.pdf
and tobacco https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/09/26_TobaccoSettlement.asp
September 26, 2019 (SAINT PAUL) — On Tuesday, September 24, Ramsey County District Court ruled that R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company has wrongfully failed to pay the State millions of dollars it owes under the terms the State’s historic 1998 tobacco settlement. In the coming months, the court will enter judgment for the amount R.J. Reynolds owes the State for its wrongful underpayment. The Minnesota Attorney General’s Office brought this case to enforce the terms of the settlement.
Claims Election,tax,interest Fraud,TheftbySwindle of Resolutions/Ordinance,
Is garbage enough to get upstart candidates elected to the St. Paul City Council? | MinnPost
Further DFL INVOLVMENT now becomes a National Issue.
By info and Belief MN Attorney Genera
Minnesota Judicial Branch - CalendarIssueSummariesl
Minnesota Judicial Branch - CalendarIssueSummariesl
Keith Ellison has not written a Constitutional Brief On appeal to the supreme court, the following issues are presented:
(1) is the referendum authority in the City Charter preempted by state statutes governing organized waste collection;
(2) would the City’s contract with waste collection haulers be unconstitutionally impaired by a referendum on the City’s ordinance governing organized waste-collection. (Ramsey County)
TO
MN ConstitutionTHE ABOVE NAMED, MNAG KEITH ELLISON in his capacity as State Attorney General MN
MN ConstitutionTHE ABOVE NAMED, MNAG KEITH ELLISON in his capacity as State Attorney General MN
IN THE MATTER OF
QUITAM RELATOR https://tacky-journalism.blogspot.com/
WIDOW ,WHITE,WOMAN,WHISTLEBLOWER, SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON AKA SCARRELLA, This case is Br
Referendum Lawsuit Court Filings - St Paul Trash Referendum Lawsuituce Clark, et al. v. City of St. Paul, et al, Ramsey County File # 62-CV-19-857
Sharon4Council
Referendum Lawsuit Court Filings - St Paul Trash Referendum Lawsuituce Clark, et al. v. City of St. Paul, et al, Ramsey County File # 62-CV-19-857
Sharon4Council
BY AND THRO MNAG DFL KEITH ELLISON State of Minnesota,
VS
RELATEES Justice Lory Gildea RAMSEY COUNTY ELECTIONS,ST.PAUL AND CITY COUNCIL ENBANC,MAYOR MELVIN CARTER,ATTORNEYS UNK, CITY CHARTER
,CONSTITUTIONALITY ORD 18-39 City Charter and Codes | Saint Paul, Minnesot
EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS,CONSENT AGENDA'S BALLOT
The Relator submits this complaint to the State Attorney General and states that there is probable cause to believe Relatees committed the following offense(s):
609.43 | Misconduct of public officer or employee. |
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
Charge: Theft by Swindle (over $35,000) Minnesota Statute: 609.52.2(a)(4), with reference to: 609.52.3(1)
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
Sharons Claim City Officials sending Bogus,Blind Invoices, unsigned, via US Mails, triggering Stale Dated Resolution without decending to particulars, describing in Detail What Public Improvements were alleged to trigger any/all Inspections.
Saint Pauls, mainly Blind Excessive Inspections
.
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
Clarification of Fraud,Flipping,Fees,Ownership Issues
Further Note to City
SaintPaulTrash.com - Documents to Downloade Revenue Raising Practicesed.
State of MN Chief Justice Lory Gilda delay of Findings of Facts,Conclusions deliberate Delay Justice Lory Gildea enbanc Stonwalling Findings of Fact,Conclusions
St. PAUL,MN et al. re Agenda s every WSaintPaulTrash.com - Documents to Downloade Revenue Raising Practicesed.
Mrs.Amy Hahm Council President must seize and desist
any/all resolutions involving Fees,Assessments, Leins against Propertys,
Without Testimony,Probable Cause of DSI INSPECTORS,
owners, including Bank,Insurance before any Ratify/Certifications
can take place. INCLUDING ALL TRASH ISSUES
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
Sharons Claim City Officials sending Bogus,Blind Invoices, unsigned, via US Mails, triggering Stale Dated Resolution without decending to particulars, describing in Detail What Public Improvements were alleged to trigger any/all Inspections.
Saint Pauls, mainly Blind Excessive Inspections
.
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
Manulipating, Ratifying,Certificy on Blind Allegations, of Excessive Inspections.
Techinally Insider Trading on Blind Inspections, to Steal Propertys,Condemn,Disable and 24% increase on Levy on Blind Trash Litigation.
Illegal use of Interest 3.6 now 4.5 to inflate, threaten Citizenery.
(4) in the capacity of such officer
CAUSES OF ACTION Amy, Lyn Moser City Financial Servicres et al Attempt to influence Elections Sharon4Council Ward 2 and Trump 2020.
MergedFil
MergedFil
8. Without immediate intervention by the Court, Petitioners will suffer irreparable harm. The City continues to enforce the terms of 18-39 in violation of the Charter
COUNT 1 Abuse of Office, Employment
Affiants Candidate Widow,Whistleblower Candidate Mrs. Sharon Anderson aka Peterson aka Scarrella, interests are the Disparity of Private Lawyers. City Attorneys and David Lillhaug given Judgship in 2nd Judicial and MN Supreme Court.REPUBLICAN DONALD TRUMP ADVOCATE
COUNT II Constitutionality of Excessive Inspections
then Ruling on Fees,Taxes,Row vs. City St. Paul. Sarah Grewing and
David Lillhaug making Dirty Deals with City St. Paul re USSC 10-1032
AS a Private Lawyer complicit with DFL Nat.Chair Tom Perez
COUNT III
When the presumption of validity afforded the assessment is rebutted, a district court has a duty as fact-finder to independently determine whether the amount of an assessment exceeds the special benefits to the property.
1998 stealing Propertys up to including 2019. http://sharon4anderson.org
609.455 PERMITTING FALSE CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENT.
A public officer or employee who audits, allows, or pays any claim or demand made upon the state or subdivision thereof or other governmental instrumentality within the state which the public officer or employee knows is false or fraudulent in whole or in part, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both609.51 SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
Subdivision 1.Acts prohibited.
Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a misdemeanor:(1) sends or delivers to another any document which simulates a summons, complaint, or court process with intent thereby to induce payment of a claim; or
(2) prints, distributes, or offers for sale any such document knowing or intending that it shall be so used.
609.86 COMMERCIAL BRIBERY.
Subdivision 1.Definition.
609.903 RACKETEERIN
Subdivision 1.Crime.
A person is guilty of racketeering if the person:(1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise and intentionally conducts or participates in the affairs of the enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity;
(2) acquires or maintains an interest in or control of an enterprise, or an interest in real property, by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or
(3) participates in a pattern of criminal activity and knowingly invests any proceeds derived from that conduct, or any proceeds derived from the investment or use of those proceeds, in an enterprise or in real property.
(1) the actor's employer or principal; or
(2) the employer or principal of the person to whom the actor offers, gives or agrees to give the bribe or from whom the actor requests, receives or agrees to receive the bribe.
City Council | 10/2/2019 | 3:30 PM | Council Chambers - 3rd Floor Public hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m. | Meeting details | Agenda | Minutes | Video |
RES 19-1597 | 1 | 11 | Excessive/Abatement Services May 22 to June 21, 2019 | R |
(31) Facebook
Please watch Tpt DFL Ken Martin misleading Public, Carnahan Republican Truth4Trump over 100K signed 4 tickets to 10Oct Rally.
GOP Party Chair Jennifer Carnahan and DFL chair Ken Martin talk impeachment and more.
Trump plays political chess but Democrats stick with checkers |
BY SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON |
Opinion | Instead, Democrats are now focused on another Trump scandal and every hour of every day that they are focusing on this is time not spent focused on policies and showcasing how their plans differ from Republicans. Democratic candidates hoping to spend time talking about their policies are now forced to talk about impeachment, which does not benefit a pool of candidates still looking to one-up the other in hopes of becoming their presidential nominee. |
Read the full story here
(651) 296-3353 (Twin Cities Calling Area) • (800) 657-3787 (Outside the Twin Cities)
(800) 627-3529 (Minnesota Relay)
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101 • M-F 8:00 am-4:30 pm
We want to hear from you.
(651) 296-3353 (Twin Cities Calling Area) • (800) 657-3787 (Outside the Twin Cities)
(800) 627-3529 (Minnesota Relay)
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101 • M-F 8:00 am-4:30 pm
|
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
No comments:
Post a Comment