WhistleblowerBlog_LawlessAmerica

From: mail@constitutionclub.ning.com
Reply-to: do-not-reply@constitutionclub.ning.com
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com

Republican Government

Thursday March 27, 2014

A Republic, If You Can Keep It

Whether we like it or not, if we don’t stand up and defend our sovereignty on an individual basis we will have no ability to stand against the tyrannical system that refuses to protect our state or national sovereignty. If truly there is no Constitutional government and we are all 14^th Amendment citizen/subjects, then we have no protections except our own selves, each other and perhaps the 2^nd Amendment. Oh that pesky “right to bear arms”.
This is a big problem for our “Dictator-in-chief”. It would seem however, that if they can create 20,000 statutes “infringing” this right, then it isn't a large step to revoke the others. We are all stewards of Planet Earth. That’s why we don’t litter and always pick up trash when we see it defacing our land. Likewise we are also keepers of freedom in America. We must start with ourselves and continue up the ladder, (or down, depending how you look at it), to the City, County, state Republic, and the Nation as a whole to defend freedom and yes the American way; (as we know it should be, not the way it is).
Whether our Founders were all Christians or not, I believe most of them were honestly thinking they were doing the right thing for the country and the future of freedom and when asked the question; “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?”, Benjamin Franklin replied - “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

Sent: 3/27/2014 11:27:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Constitution Club Links

http://api.ning.com/files/NnMed0rJC6audFXkoV7JzN0vYWX6khAivqijN2Cw6qCCTBdtdpJFHRXg0VEmGBTNKR-TxWClA8*oUSV1iSsbapm8aWkAsOCb/constitutionclubbanner.jpg

County Websites Click Here

Making of America Click Here

Principles of Liberty Click Here

Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land Click Here

Study Guide Click Here

The Law by Frederic Bastiat Click Here

Constitutional Studies Click Here

Philosophy of Liberty Click Here

Spokesmen for Liberty Click Here

More Resources Click Here

Visit The Constitution Club at: http://constitutionclub.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Click here: Victoria Ástríður Andersen www.lawlessamerica.com Bill Windsor Co-Fighter.

Victoria Ástríður Andersen shared a link.

about an hour ago near Atlanta, GA

My co-fighter, Bill Windsor, means serious business. He and I are two peas in a pod. Please join my new group to help me in exposing respective corruption at: www.facebook.com/groups/GeorgiaPoliticsandLaw

Plans announced to bring Criminal Charges against Every Corrupt Government Official in America

www.lawlessamerica.com

Plans announced to bring Criminal Charges against Every Corrupt Government Official in America

Victoria Ástríður Andersen

Highlights

Bill Windsor Co-Fighter Please Assist

In a message dated 11/4/2012 12:45:00 P.M. Central Standard Time, jon.roland@constitution.org writes:

The entire practice of in rem asset forfeiture presents a constitutional problem of taking without due process.

The case is
United States of America v. 434 Main Street, Tewksbury, Massachusetts.

Litigation Backgrounder

Imagine you own a million-dollar piece of property free and clear, but then the federal government announces that it is going to take it from you, not compensate you one dime, and then pad the budgets of federal and local law enforcement agencies with the money they get from selling your land—all this even though you have never so much as been accused of a crime, let alone convicted of one.

That is the nightmare Russ Caswell and his family is now facing in Tewksbury, Mass., where they stand to lose the family-operated motel they have owned for two generations.

Seeking to circumvent state law and cash in on the profits, the Tewksbury Police Department is working with the U.S. Department of Justice to take and sell the Caswells property because a tiny fraction of people who have stayed at the Motel Caswell during the past 20 years have been arrested for crimes. Keep in mind, the Caswells themselves have worked closely with law enforcement officials to prevent and report crime on their property. And the arrests the government complains of represent less than .05 percent of the 125,000 rooms the Caswells have rented over that period of time.

Despite all this, the Caswells stand to lose literally everything they have worked for because of this effort by federal and local law enforcement officials not to pursue justice, but rather to police for profit.

How widespread is the problem of civil forfeiture abuse nationwide? In 1986, the year after the U.S. Department of Justice’s Asset Forfeiture Fund was created—the fund that holds the forfeiture proceeds from properties forfeited under federal law and available to be paid out to law enforcement agencies—took in just $93.7 million. Today it holds more than $1.6 billion.

The Institute for Justice, a national public interest law firm that fights civil forfeiture abuse nationwide, is now representing the Caswells in defense of their property and their constitutional rights

Related links:
Motel owner faces asset forfeiture despite innocence, Washington Post
The Motel Caswell and the Red Carpet Inn, Americans for Forfeiture Reform
The American Nightmare That Is Civil Asset Forfeiture, Future of Freedom Foundation
Can your money commit a crime without your consent?, Larry Salzman
Welcome to the Upside-Down World of Civil Forfeiture, Jacob Sullum, Reason.com
Peculiarities Surrounding the Civil Forfeiture of the Motel Caswell, Deborah Brancic

-- Jon ---------------------------------------------------------- Constitution Society http://constitution.org 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 twitter.com/lex_rex Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 jon.roland@constitution.org ----------------------------------------------------------

NEWS RELEASE 3RDNOV.2012

http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA120622-1031.pdf

On the Graves of our Heritage Minnesota HomeGrownGal Pleads VOTE6THNOV12.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWo8izqaeif54FJfUPikd86CvLPhVx0kuOBYbdhbt7XXlVX5L5YtK6YgcTwWRgeu4M649iCqY3g5XYoaVCdtjylsbGSxiKIiU4ORU6fqYKS595ZShIiisXqsmK_L98d7Ah_weGhwox7jyN/s1600/Bernice83.jpg

Sent: 11/3/2012 11:16:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: CandidateSharon4SeniorsMN64_Constitutionality204c.31County_State Canvass Boards Sharon is not a Liar or Lawyer Unreasonable 20 yrs later Tobacco Case Still in Court THEREFORE DFL Lawyer,Commitment Lawyer Senator64 Dick Cohen MN CONST.ARTIII MUST GO:

TThe Supreme Court concluded (1) the proposed tobacco appropriation bonds did not constitute public debt for which the state's full faith, credit, and taxing powers have been pledged under the plain language of Minn. Const. art. XI, 4; and (2) therefore, the restrictions imposed by Minn. Const. art. XI, 5 do not apply to the bondsSearch Results

MPR: Minnesota's Tobacco Trial: A Summary

news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/.../08_stawickie_histo...Cached - SimilarShare
Shared on Google+. View the post.

You +1'd this publicly. Undo
May 8, 1998 – At its heart, Minnesota's tobacco case was a fraud and anti-trust case. The state and Blue Cross and Blue Shield claimed tobacco companies Schowalter v. State

Docket: A12-622
Judge: Per Curiam

Areas of Law: Constitutional Law

Petitioner, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget, validation tobacco appropriation bonds to be issued to refund, in advance of maturity, outstanding tobacco securit
Opinion Date: October 31, 20

http://j.st/X92

View Case on: Justia Google Scholar

12

SAT: 3NOV2012

Please Vote Tues 6thNov2012 Forward,circulate,copy Vote YES Sharon4Seniors

Minnesota4Mitt4Marriage

   Subject: Candidate SharonAndersonABOLISH SCAPCommittment PanelJudgesBadBehaviorRICO Wilful neglience to AbateSeeking Assistance also www.lawlessamerica.com NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH INTENT TO CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF COUNTY AND STATE CANVASS BOARD MEMBERS, DEFENDANTS MARK OSWALD, SHARI MOORE CITY CLERK,JUDGE KAREN J. ASPHAUG MEMBER OF SCAP ET AL. MN CONSTITUTION ART. III SEPARATION OF POWERS. Ruling Case Law In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562 www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com www.lufsky.blogspot.com

ThereforeSharon4AG2014

1.    Ramsey   County canvassing board:            Rafael Ortega, Ramsey County Commissioner

                                                                                Jan Parker, Ramsey County Commissioner

                                                                                Mark Oswald, Ramsey County Auditor

                                                                                Lawrence Dease, Ramsey County Court Administrator

                                                                 Shari Moore, St Paul City Clerk – designee of Mayor Coleman

ST. PAUL, Minn.—October 30, 2012—Secretary of State Mark Ritchie today announced the members of the State Canvassing Board whose responsibility it will be to canvass and certify the results of the State General Election held on November 6.

Minnesota Statutes 204C.31 requires the Secretary of State to select the five members of state canvassing board. By law members of the board must be the secretary of state, two judges from the Minnesota Supreme Court and two judges of the district court.

Members of the 2012 State General Election State Canvassing Board include:
• The Honorable Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Secretary of State
• The Honorable Paul H. Anderson, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Christopher J. Dietzen, Associate Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court
• The Honorable Edward I. Lynch, Chief Judge, First Judicial District
• The Honorable Karen J. Asphaug, District Court Judge, First Judicial District

To avoid conflicts of interest, by law, no judges or justices who are members of the state canvassing board may be candidates at the election. It is also important to note that unlike other election issues subject to administrative recounts, constitutional amendments are not subject to recounts administered by the state canvassing board, but are subject to court election contests.

The State Canvassing Board will meet at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, in Room 10 of the State Office Building located at 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota

http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ must file July 2013

                                  Thurs.11Oct.2012   VOTE YOUR PRINCIPLES_PASSIONS_PERSONS NOV6TH,2012

     To the Above Named: Hon. DFL Mark Dayton,DFL Lori Swanson, Chief Justice Lori Gildea, her opponent Dan Griffin, et al,Candidates, Media, Editors of all Newspapers, MN&USA. Please Assist Judicial Complicity.

Sharon VA Widow, has put her Life on the Line, When Public Officials are Notified of High Crimes and Misdemeanor , re: Oath of Office, the Police Power must enforce, with Grand Jury Proceedings.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/obstructing_justice_statutes.html

JUDGES OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PRACTING LAW VIA FALSE,BOGUS,UNPUBLISHED ORDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513

Title 18 U.S.C. § 111

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1961

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986

Years of blowback consequences from criminal acts protecting high-level corruption

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=484.06

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf

                                       CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON'S www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com  state and alleges that the Forensic Evidence of                 COUNT I MS609.903 RICO

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT_CHAP_SEC&year=2006&section=609.903

Subdivision 1. Crime. A person is guilty of racketeering if the person:
(1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise and intentionally conducts or participates
in the affairs of the enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity;
(2) acquires or maintains an interest in or control of an enterprise, or an interest in real
property, by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or
(3) participates in a pattern of criminal activity and knowingly invests any proceeds derived
from that conduct, or any proceeds derived from the investment or use of those proceeds, in an
enterprise or in real property.

Judges using their Official Capacity in thir Licensed Franchise are Guilty of Rackerteering in Minnesota, Forensic Files www.sharon4anderson.org www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com DISCLAIMER: HON. BILL WINDSOR www.lawlessamerica.com

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=522:federal-courts-do-not-issue-valid-orders-check-the-orders-in-your-case&catid=121:articles&Itemid=222

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf

Current Candidate _Senate64
www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson
www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson
www.sharon4anderson.org

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-